back to top
Home Blog Page 20

What makes SA favourites for the upcoming T20 WC

“Favourites, Dark Horses, Hot Contenders” are typically used when describing South Africa before every big event. They are always the talk of the town on the big stage surrounded by superstars and everyone thinks this is their time.

There was always a strong South African team, but they never tasted gold in the last three decades except for 1998, when Jacques Kallis’ individual brilliance won them the inaugural ICC knockout trophy.

SA somehow fall short of the line no matter what happens, whether it’s getting screwed by the DLS farce in the 1992 semi-finals, miscalculating the score in 2003, or the result of some horrible fielding in 2015.

Does this beg the question has their time finally arrived?
The reason that they may cross the line and win the WC this time is the composition of the side. This is probably their best ever 15 fielded in a T20 WC.

A major upgrade from the previous tournaments where they had Jacques Kallis and Hashim Amla opening the batting once upon a time. They have a coach in Mark Boucher who has delivered results in the past year and a half and a calm leader in Bavuma who has delivered results with the Lions and won them a couple of trophies.

Since mid-2021, SA won 3-2 in WI, a series win in Ireland, Completed a whitewash in SL and won 4 out of their 5 games in t20 WC after agonizingly falling short of NRR. They continued their good form by drawing a series 2-2 in India and defeated Eng in their own backyard 2-1.

They ended their UK tour with a 2-0 win against Ireland. They suffered a major blow with RVD sustaining an injury during the test series and he will be a major miss on those Australian wickets. SA have Reeza Hendricks as a backup opener who has scored 296 runs at an SR of 142 in the last 5 outings for the national side.

South Africa’s USP is their batting lineup from 3-7 and It won’t be wrong to say they have one of the best lineups in the tournament for the following reasons.

No.3: Rilee Rossouw

While playing for SA between 2014 and 2016, he was touted as the country’s next batting superstar. However, things didn’t go as planned, and he signed a Kolpak deal with Hampshire in 2017.

A little more than 6 years after he last played for his country, he made his return in July 2022 against England. His 96 at Cardiff almost booked him a seat on that plane to Australia. A left-handed middle-order batter who can play spin is an asset to any side.

Rossouw had to end ties with Hampshire as they didn’t retain him as an overseas player and after UK’s exit from European Union (EU), he could no longer play as a local player. With 623 runs at a mind-boggling SR of 192, Rossouw finished as the 2nd highest run scorer in the Blast season. Before that, he had an equally good outing in PSL by scoring runs at an avg of 40 and an SR of 167.

No.4: Aiden Markram

In 2017-18, when Aiden Markram made his debut with 2 100s in his first three test matches, Graeme Smith, arguably the greatest test captain of all time, dubbed him the future captain of the Proteas.

It was Markram’s career-defining performance against Australia that crowned him as SA’s next test great, but things went south quickly, and he almost lost his place in all three formats. In March 2021, Markram had just played a few t20Is before being named as an injury replacement for a four-match series against Pakistan.

It was a turning point in his career, and Markram seized the opportunity with both hands, scoring 179 runs at an impressive SR of 182. Since that series, he has scored 729 runs at an SR of 151 maintaining a healthy average of 45.

Batting at 4 or below he has more than 400 runs in front of his name at an SR of 143 making him one of the best middle-order batters going around. Owing to these performances he was picked by Punjab Kings in the 2nd half of 2021 and in In February 2022, he was bought by the Sunrisers Hyderabad in the auction for the 2022 Indian Premier League tournament.

Along with being a capable part-time bowler who can regularly bowl in powerplays, Markram is special for his ability to play spin, something that is essential for the modern T20 batter.

No.5/6: David Miller

A side’s lower middle order and a finisher are the most difficult and responsible positions to fill in T20is. It is one of the toughest jobs and it is not an easy thing to swing your bat right away.

It is very important to have skilled batters because games are often made and broken in the final phases. And, who else than David Miller is the perfect candidate for the job currently? Miller is one of the greatest finishers this format has probably seen with tons of experience under his belt.

He has over 1.6K runs batting at 5 or below at an SR of 139 with 71 sixes. No one has scored more runs than him at a better SR. If we apply the same parameters, he has over 1.8K runs at an SR of 141 in IPL. Only Kieron Pollard has scored more runs than him at a better SR.

We saw the second coming of David Miller in this IPL, despite playing just 28 games from 2017-21. He has restructured the way he plays, especially against spin, after admitting he didn’t give himself enough time to get his eye in.

The testimony of his father and childhood coach further supported this. He pulled off memorable chases that were outside GT’s grasps like 94* off 51 against CSK, 39* off 24 against RCB, and 68* off 38 against RR in Qualifier 1.

No.6/5: Tristan Stubbs

Stubbs enjoyed a breakout season in the CSA T20 tournament this year where he was the 2nd highest scorer with 293 runs at a whopping SR of 183.

It was Dewald Brevis who captured all the attention at the U 19 World Cup and later IPL while Stubbs made headlines by joining the Mumbai Indians mid-season for an injured Tymal Mills.

When he was called up to the national team, he smashed 72 runs off 28 balls at the number 6 against England, proving himself on the international stage.

He later joined Manchester originals in The Hundred and scored 157 runs at an SR of 146 which included an innings where he hit Tabraiz Shamsi for 4 consecutive sixes. He is also a handy part-timer and can keep wickets as well.

He helped the Originals to win some games with his bowling by picking 4 wickets in the tournament. He is an ideal no.5/6 if SA continues to persist with him in place of Henrich Klassen.

Sunrisers Eastern Cape bought Tristan Stubbs for 26% of their overall purse in SA20 and became the most expensive player in the auction in South Africa T20 league. He was sold to Sunrisers Eastern Cape for 9.2 Million Rands.

No.7: Dwaine Pretorious / Wayne Parnell

Dwaine Pretorious did an amazing job with the ball at the death for the Proteas in the last T20 WC. He picked up 9 wickets at an eco of less than 7.

Since the beginning of 2021, he has picked the most wickets (25) for SA in the pace department and overall is 2nd on the list. A bowling all-rounder who bowls at the death and bats at 7 is a luxury for any side.

Pretorius ticks these boxes and could be a huge asset for the proteas in the upcoming WT20. His recent performances in the CPL and The Hundred could push him below Wayne Parnell in the pecking order who featured in the series against India ahead of him.

The Proteas have been placed in Group B along with India, Pakistan and Bangladesh in the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2022. With Lungi, Nortje and Rabada on the pace front coupled with one of the smartest cricketing minds in Keshava Maharaj and Tabreiz Shamsi in the spin department, it offers Bavuma too many options, they have the best chance of creating history.

The Intriguing History of Asia Cup: Wins, Records & Statistics

0

Currently, the Asia Cup 2022 is underway in Sharjah, UAE. It’s the biggest tournament outside of ICC events. However, the enthusiasm in the audience for Asia Cup exceeds even some of the tournaments held by ICC. 

Asia Cup’s existence is a miracle in itself. From being delayed multiple times and being postponed to breaking viewership world records. From India abandoning the Asia Cup to India winning 7 out of the 14 editions. 

When it was introduced, people questioned whether this model was even practical & their concerns were right; it was not in the initial years. However, Asia Cup overcame all the obstacles with time by evolving and stands as one of the most renowned Cricket Tournament to this day.

Following is a brief history & overview of the ups and downs of the Asia cup, despite the unprecedented challenges. How the Asia Cup was a success in every edition? and how players gave it their all to make it so.

The Creation of Asia Cup from Dust:

Shortly after the ACC (Asia Cricket council) formed in 1983, the Asia cup was announced, and the first edition was held in 1984. The main reason for this tournament was to promote compassion between the Asian teams. Unfortunately enough, it ended up doing the complete opposite. 

Everything went smoothly in the 1st edition. However, when the 2nd edition started, India withdrew owing to deteriorating cricketing relations with Sri Lanka. This was a critical period for the Asia Cup because Indians make up most of its audience.

Following suit, Pakistan boycotted the 1990–91 Asia Cup due to hostilities between India and themselves. The 1993 Cup had to be called off because of how intense it became between the two. Some were questioning if the Asia cup would make a comeback. Because Asia cup’s two out of three competitors pulled out.  

There were three teams in the beginning: Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and India. However, Asia Cup has grown significantly. Afghanistan, Hong Kong, UAE & Bangladesh have also joined Asia Cup. The 2023 edition, which will have 8 teams, is expected to further increase this number.

Changes to The Format of the Asia Cup over time:

Initially, with the advent of the Asia Cup in 1984, the cup was based on a round-robin structure in which each competitor faced every other competitor. This worked smoothly in the initial years. 

However, when more countries entered the Asia Cup in the years that followed, this round-robin format became impractical. The Asian Cricket Council then abandoned this structure in favour of a new one. This newly inducted format was divided into three stages: the group stage, the notorious super four-stage, and the final. 

This change was officially implemented in the 8th edition of the Asia cup in 2004; this has been the Cup’s format to this day. 

Following that, there was a drastic transformation in the Cup in 2016 when it was announced by the chief executive Syed Ashraful Haq of ACC that the Asia cup tournaments would be played on an alternate basis. Switching between T20 and one-day format.  This change also continues to this day.

A Brief Overview of The Editions of The Asia Cup:

1. 1984

The first edition was held in Sharjah, the city of the ACC headquarters. After defeating Sri Lanka, India won the first edition. Over the course of the first edition, Pakistan failed to even secure a single win. There were three teams in total. 

Ravi Shastri got the most wickets (4), & Surinder Khanna got the most runs (107) and the player of the tournament award, respectively. They are both Indian sportsmen. India dominated the maiden Asia Cup.

2. 1986

The second edition was hosted by Sri Lanka; in the final, Sri Lanka won against Pakistan by 5 wickets. The interesting part is that the 2nd edition was played between  Pakistan, Sri Lanka & Bangladesh because India pulled out of the tournament. 

Abdul Qadir took 9 wickets, earning him the award for the most wickets for Pakistan. While Arjuna Ranatunga scored 105 runs earning him the award of most runs & player of the series. 

3. 1988 

The 3rd edition was hosted by Bangladesh; the games were the first List A-classified matches ever played in Bangladesh, which was back then an Associate Member of the International Cricket Council (ICC), with Full Members of ICC as its opponents.

India came on top in this edition after defeating Sri Lanka with 5 wickets. Arshad Ayub from India took the most wickets (9) and earned the title of the best bowler of that edition. Ijaz Ahmed earned the award for most runs(192). Navjot Sidhu, the legendary Indian cricketer, won the player of the series.

4. 1990-91

The 1990-91 edition was hosted in India, so Pakistan abandoned the 4th edition of the tournament for that very reason. However, the tournament went smoothly as planned, regardless of the participation or abandonment of any team. 

In the final, India won against Sri Lanka with 7 wickets. No one was awarded the player of the series. However, Arjuna Ranatunga scored 166 & Kapil dev took 9 wickets, earning them the top spots. 

The planned 5th edition was to take place in 1993. However, due to tensions between India and Pakistan, it was called off by the ACC.

5. 1995

The actual 5th edition was hosted by UAE; Sri Lanka and India clashed on the ground, but India came on top with 8 wickets. This victory was remarkable; India devastated Sri Lanka by winning with 8 wickets. 

The most scoring player was Sachin Tendulkar, a legendary batsman. While Anil Kumble got 7 wickets and became the tournament’s best bowler.

6. 1997 

The 6th edition was a matter of integrity for the Sri Lankan team; they were in pursuit of revenge, which they got after winning the final with 8 wickets against India. 

Arjuna Ranatunga emerged as the top batsman while Venkatesh Parsad was the best bowler for this edition. 4 teams participated, and 8 matches were played in total.

7. 2000

The 7th edition was hosted by Bangladesh. Unfortunately, this was the first time India didn’t qualify for the final, except in 1986 when India pulled out, but India kept qualifying for the final. This legendary streak was broken, 7 so were the hearts of millions of Indians. 

Pakistan ended up winning against Sri Lanka by 39 runs. Since its inception, this was the first time Pakistan won the Asia Cup.

8. 2004 

There was a considerable gap between the 7th and the 8th editions of the Asia Cup, almost 4 years. This delay was because the Asia Cup was remodelled at this time. 

The transition from a round-robin format to a new format happened during this period. This was the first edition to have 6 teams after the addition of Hong Kong and UAE to the Asia Cup. 

In the final, Sri Lanka came on top after defeating India with 25 runs. The 8th edition was hosted by Sri Lanka at 3 different venues. 

Shoaib Malik scored the highest with 316 runs, while Irfan Pathan took 14 wickets and earned the place of the top scorer and top bowler of the tournament, respectively.

9. 2008

The 9th edition of the Asia Cup was originally planned to begin in 2006; however, tight International schedules didn’t let that happen, so it was delayed by 4 years. 

The Cup was divided into 2 groups; group A consisted of Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and UAE. At the same time, group B consisted of India, Pakistan, and Hong Kong. 

This tournament was held in Pakistan & Sri Lanka, winning the final after defeating India with 100 runs.

10. 2010

The 2010 Asia cup was the 10th edition. It was held in Sri Lanka; India won after defeating Sri Lanka with 81 runs in the final. This was the 5th win for India in the Asia Cup. 

Most runs were scored by Shahid Afridi, standing at 265. While Lasith Malinga took 9 wickets, earning him the award for the most wickets.

11. 2012

The 2012 cup was the 11th edition hosted by Bangladesh and held in Dhaka. Bangladesh defeated Sri Lanka to reach the finals for the first time. On the other hand, Pakistan hasn’t won the Asia Cup for the last 12 years. The stakes were high, but after a nail bitting match, Pakistan emerged victorious merely with just 2 runs. 

  • Virat Kohli scored the most, with 357 runs.
  • While Umar Gul took 9 wickets
  • Shakib Al Hasan earned the award for player of the series. 

12. 2014

The 12th edition was again hosted by Bangladesh; this was the first time some country hosted the Asia cup consecutively. Afghanistan also took part in the 2014’s Asia cup for the first time. 

In the final, Pakistan clashed against Sri Lanka, but Sri Lanka won with 5 wickets. This was the 5th win for Sri Lanka & this number hasn’t changed to this date.  

13. 2016

The 13th edition of the Asia Cup saw some drastic changes as it was the first Asia cup to follow the T20 format. This was per the ACC’s decision to alternate the Asia cup’s format every 2 years. 

There were 5 participants & 11 matches played at a single venue in Bangladesh. Yes! You heard it right; this was the 3rd consecutive Asia cup in Bangladesh. 

Nevertheless, India won the Asia cup after defeating Bangladesh by 5 wickets. This accounted for the 6th Asia cup win for the boys in the blue.

14. 2018

India was originally supposed to host the 14th edition, but tensions between Pakistan and India were rising. To ensure Pakistan’s participation, Mohammed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, asked BCCI whether they would consider handing the role of host to the UAE. Without interrupting the games, BCCI assigned UAE the role of host. 

India eventually won the final match against Bangladesh, winning by a margin of three wickets.

Baffling Records set during Asia Cup:

Around seven times, India won the Asia Cup in 1984, 1988, 1990–91, 1995, 2010, 2016, and 2018. Followed by Sri Lanka with five victories in 1986, 1997, 2004, 2008, and 2014. Pakistan has two victories and is ranked third.

43 players have achieved a total of 53 centuries; however, 52 of these centuries have been set in the one-day format. The only player with a century in the Twenty20 format is Babar Hayat of Hong Kong.

There have only ever been 11 “5-wicket hauls” in the competition’s history, and Lasith Malinga owns three of them.

In an ODI match against Pakistan in 2012, Virat Kohli set a record-high total of 183 runs, which has not been beaten.

Regardless of the rough and politicized history, the future holds a lot for the Asia cup.

Where Does Rohit Sharma Rank among the ODI Openers of All-Time

Rohit Sharma’s ODI career had two separate halves, both quite contrasting. 

One from his debut in ODI cricket against Ireland in 2007 to the start of 2013, during this phase of his career, he batted everywhere, from the opening to the no. 7 position. That was a horrible phase in his career. 

1978 runs in 81 innings with an average of 30.43 and a strike rate of 77.93.  16 50+ scores, including 2 hundred, A 50+ score in every 5th inning. 

These numbers are too far from being called even average; they are ridiculously bad, especially for a batsman of his calibre.

Even though Rohit opened for 3 matches against South Africa during this time, he scored 23, 1, and 5. 

Then came 23 January 2013. In the 4th ODI Match against England, He was given a chance to open again after a gap of 2 years. 

Sharma then scored 83 off 89 balls. That inning was a breakthrough moment in his ODI career; since the end of this match, he came to bat in the 1st over of Indian Innings (whenever he plays) for each and every ODI match, except a single game against Afghanistan in 2014, where he came to bat at no.3. 

The numbers totally changed in this phase, 7305 runs, almost 3.5 times as compared to the previous in the innings (141) which are just 1.75 times as the previous. The average is now 57.97, with the strike rate being 92.59. 

59 50+ scores with 27 centuries, meaning the no. of innings taken to score a 50+ score in ODI cricket (2.4) has now become comparatively half for Hitman.

Everything has gone upward for him. He is now one of The Best ODI Openers of All Time from being close to average.

But how to compare his numbers with the openers from different generations, a raw comparison, will be entirely inappropriate. ODI cricket has changed throughout the years, and due to that, the inflation in runs has increased throughout the years. An average of 47 with a Strike Rate of 87 is just decent enough in the current period; in the 80s, these numbers were sufficient for Viv Richards to be called The Greatest ODI Batsman of all time.

I have selected all the openers with more than 5000 runs in One-Day Cricket (As an opener). 

The Table is given below

As visible in the table, Sachin Tops the Runs Chart, Rohit has the highest Average, and no one scores as fast as Sehwag.

But should we compare these numbers directly? The answer to this will be No.

As discussed in our Previous Articles, ODI cricket has changed significantly since its inception. 

For example, During Desmond Haynes’s career (1978-1994), an average of 218 runs was scored per 50 overs. Now, if you compare it with someone like Quinton De Kock’s Career (2013-2022), 265 runs are scored in the same amount of overs. 

In my previous article on Era Adjusted Bowling Average, Economy and Strike Rate in ODI Cricket, I explained the Z-Factor concept and how we can use it to derive era-adjusted numbers, which can be further used to compare the 2 players of Different Generation.

Just like we did for ODI Bowlers, We will do it for all the 24 openers who fulfilled our essential criteria.

Z-Factor Values for ODI Openers with over 5000 runs

Still, For a shorter Introduction, the Z-Factor is the ratio of a player metric (average, strike rate, etc.) to the average value of that metric during the player’s playing days.

For Example, The Z-Factor of Batting Average for Rohit Sharma will be equal to Rohit’s Batting Average/ Mean Batting Average during Rohit’s Playing years.

Now, We will do this on 2 scales, one in which we consider the mean averages of the Top 6 batsmen and another in which we will just consider the mean average of only opening batsmen in that period. The average of these two values will be taken as a final value.

Let’s take the example of Saeed Anwar; he has an average of 39.98 as an opener in ODI cricket, and the mean average of the Top 6 Batsman during his career was 31.95.

That means the Z-Factor value associated with his batting average will be 39.98/31.95=1.25. Now, the mean average of Opening Batsmen during his career was 32.71. So, the Z-Factor will be 39.98/32.71=1.22 in this case. So, to make it clear, we will take the average of both the Z-Factor values, which will be 1.24 in the case of Anwar. 

Note: In Both considerations, we will take the mean numbers from the player’s career opening days, from the year they started opening in international cricket to the year in which they played their last match as an opener.

However, in the case of Rohit Sharma, we will take the average numbers from 2013, as he opened for just 3 innings between 2011 and 13.

Rohit Again Tops the Average Column, Sachin at 2nd. Regarding Strike Rate, Sehwag, Gilchrist, Jayasuriya, Tendulkar, and Warner are in the Top 5. However, no one scores a 50+ score at a better rate than Rohit Sharma; in terms of scoring a century, Master Blaster is significantly better than anyone else. 

Sachin is the only batsman to be present in the Top 4 in all the criteria we have used, top one, second in 2, and 4th in one. This is absolutely phenomenal level stuff, especially for a person who has played 340 innings as an ODI opener. There is no doubt about him being the Greatest ODI Opener of All Time.

Tharanga and Iqbal are right at the bottom of the chart; Tharanga has the lowest value for both average and strike rate, and Iqbal has the 2nd lowest for both.

Accommodated/Standard Form:

As we explained the concept of the Z-Factor earlier, we will now use these Z-Factor values to obtain the numbers into standard/more straightforward form, taking a fixed period for every player, in our case, Rohit Sharma’s career span as an opener (2013-2022). 

Mean Data for 2013-2022 (average of top 6 batsman values and openers values as stated) 

  • Batting Average: 35.33
  • Strike Rate: 84.03
  • Innings/50+ score: 4.09    
  • Innings/100: 15.49

Taking this as a standard, the table of adjusted numbers is given below:

Adjusted Runs are calculated considering the ratio of Average and RPI for batsmen.

Note: They are just the overall numbers in the adjusted form, off-course they tell us the brief story, but that’s not all. 

Even when two players have played in the same period, One can improve his numbers by playing against weaker opposition or bowling attacks compared to another.

World Cup Stats of the Selected Openers

As the most significant cricketing event, it is significantly more important than regular bilateral matches; hence, the performance in these matches is worth a separate mention.

As the raw numbers suggest:

  • 6 players average more than 55
  • Only 5 batsman strikes at over 95 runs per 100 balls.
  • 7 scores a 50+ score in every 2.5 innings or less
  • 5 of them take 5 or fewer innings to score a century

2 batsmen are common in both aspects: David Warner and Rohit Sharma. They average over 60 (5 more than our criteria) by striking over 95 and fulfilling the other criteria.

Rohit deserved a particular appraisal by looking at the raw WC stats; he has the highest average as an opener in the ODI World Cup, and his strike rate is 5th best in the list with taking the least no. of innings to score a 50+ score (a 50+ score in every 1.89 innings) and a century( a 100 in every 2.83 innings).

Z-Factor Values for WC Stats of Selected ODI Openers

The process will be almost the same as previously stated, except for a tiny change; as in this case, we will assign weighted Z-Factors for each WC Campaign.

For Example, Shikhar Dhawan’s Z-factor for the 2015 World Cup is 1.45, and as he scored 76.72% of his WC runs in that particular World Cup, we will take “1.11” (76.72% of 1.45) as the weighted z-factor value for that World Cup for Shikhar Dhawan.

Likewise, Shikhar’s Z-Factor for WC 2019 is 1.62, and because he has played only 2 matches in this WC (due to a finger injury), he has scored only 23.28 % of his WC career runs in this particular tournament.

So the weighted Z-Factor assigned for this tournament for Shikhar will be “0.38” (23.28% of 1.62)

Combining The Weighted Z-Factors values for both of his WC campaigns will give us his final Z-Factor value for his WC career as 1.49(1.11+0.38).

That 1.49 denotes Dhawan’s average is 1.49 times better than the mean average in the WC matches he played.

Key Points from this table:

  • Gary Kirsten(2.54) and Gibbs(2.25) are the only batsmen whose average is more than twice better than the mean average; Sachin and Mark Waugh followed him (both averages are 1.93 times better than the mean)
  • Sehwag strikes the fastest (1.36 times better than the mean), with Gilchrist just a dot behind him (1.35 times)
  • Only 4 players score 50+ score at a more than twice better rate than the mean, Tendulkar (2.4), Gibbs (2.2), Waugh(2.09) and Rohit(2.02)
  • Mark Waugh’s century scoring rate is 5.77 times better than the mean; no one else has even 5 times better. The second best is Rohit Sharma, scoring a century 4.75 faster than the mean batsman.

Conclusion

That’s the end of our article, all the stats (both in raw and adjusted form) are presented, and Rohit is right among the top in both. 

There is a reason why the Hitman is rated so high by the experts; in the field of overall numbers, he looks the best since Sachin, and with regards to the World Cup stats, his numbers are good enough to be considered an all-time ODI Great. 

Thanks for reading to the end. Please remember to share this article on your various social media handles. 

Why Batting in Test Cricket Has Become Much Harder?

What happened in the last 4-5 years in Test Cricket; There has to be a reason for the dip in batting performances; a 400+ score when 2 Top teams playing against each other is as rare as a fast-bowling all-rounder in India, maybe not that extreme, but still the batting numbers of batsman/teams are going downwards at a rapid pace.

The level of decline is clearly visible in this chart; 2018 was the toughest year to bat in the last 50 years

From 2001 to 2017, the mean batting average in Test cricket was higher than 30 each year; since 2018, not even a single year has touched the mark of 30.

Now, Some teams don’t have a single batsman in their lineup, whose Batting Average in Test cricket touches the mark of 50 (WI, ENG, SL, BAN, PAK, SA); NZ and IND have 1 player each; Aus have 2, in which Labuschagne is not much tested yet.

Once upon a time, in the earlier part of this century, every team used to have 1-2 players with a 50+ average and 1-2 batsmen with an average lying between 40-50. 

So, what just happened?, Is the overall quality of batsmanship in Test cricket been reduced in the last 3 years? , maybe it can be said, for a team like West Indies. But with batting averages depleting everywhere in the world, there has to be something to justify why it is happening. 

There can be many reasons for that; the increase in the quality of bowling lineups, particularly fast bowling attacks and the change in pitches are two of the most common and logical reasons.

Let’s discuss both of the reasons in a deeper manner.

Fast Bowling Attacks: Lethal and Deep

Batting in Test cricket is a secondary weapon; bowling is the primary.

In most circumstances in Test cricket, a team is just as good as its bowling attack, particularly its fast-bowling attack.

For example, a team of 5 world-class bowlers can say 5 Cummins, with 5 decent batsmen will beat a team of 5 Joe Root and 5 average bowlers in a Test match in most scenarios.

It significantly impacts the batting numbers of batsmen; a bowling attack of higher quality will obviously concede fewer runs than an average/poor bowling attack, even on the same surface against the same lineup. The difference in runs will depend on the difference in the quality of bowling attacks.

So we will compare the fast bowling attack of the existing era (2018-2022) with the bowling attack of 2000-2005; below is the country-wise fast-bowling comparison of every team in both periods.

Note: All the stats used in this are valid as of 21 Feb 2022.

Australia

Australia in the 2000-2005 period had a fast-bowling attack of Lee, Gillispie and McGrath, which looks more prominent in the initial view as compared to the current ones of Cummins, Hazlewood and Starc.

Regardless of that first look, statistically, the existing attack is better or just as good as the previous one; McGrath of 2000-2005 was exceptional; the same goes with Cummins as he averages less than 20 in the other period.

Starc, if not better, is as good as Lee; the matter of Hazelwood and Gillespie is also similar in our selected span. 

  • Runs Per Wicket by Aus Pacers in 2000-2005:27.28
  • Runs Per Wicket by Aus Pacers since 2018:24.25

It will even go slightly worse if we compare their pace attacks when the three lead pacers played together; the attack led by McGrath gave 28.46 runs per wicket, and Cummins one just gave 24.69.

New Zealand

Shouldn’t waste a second of time here in comparison; the current Pace attack of Southee, Wagner, Boult and Jamieson is way apart from Martin, Cairns, Tuffey, and Bond.

The previous pace attack was at max decent, which is why 12 pacers in that era bowled more than 100 overs compared to 5 in the ongoing one.

Just 1 pacer Shane Bond can come into the current bowling lineup of NZ; however, any of the 4 pacers of the current attack will walk into the previous side of NZ easily and that too is the second-best bowler of that attack.

  • Runs Per Wicket by NZ Pacers in 2000-2005: 33.43
  • Runs Per Wicket by NZ Pacers since 2018-:24.32

Stats say that the current attack will dismiss his opponents on an average score of 243, 91 runs less than what a 00-05 attack would have given for the same task.  

India

The case of India lies in the same bracket as New Zealand; the current Indian fast-bowling attack is not just better than the 00-05 era one; it is by far the best Indian fast-bowling attack ever. “The only world-class fast-bowling attack India have in their Test history”.

In the current attack of Shami, Bumrah, Ishant and Umesh, Shami has the highest average (24.08); not to surprise that even after being the worst of the 4, that number is still better than all the 14 pacers bowled for India in the 2000-2005 period. 

The three main pacers (Bumrah, Shami and Ishant) of the current team can walk into the bowling attack of 2000-2005 as lead bowlers of that attack.

  • Runs Per Wicket by Indian Pacers in 2000-2005:37.74
  • Runs Per Wicket by Indian Pacers since 2018:23.77

The difference of almost 14 runs per wicket is self-explanatory, and it justified all the points mentioned above, maybe showing more than what I described.

West Indies 

West Indies’ story in the early part of this century was not ideal; Walsh took 93 wickets for them, the second-most in the selected period; but he just played 1 and a half years; Ambrose played even less than that.

In the current attack, 2 Bowlers; Holder and Roach averages less than 25; just one bowler (Walsh) from the previous attack averages less than 25 with at least 500 overs bowled.

Even if we keep his batting skills aside, Holder could have played in the previous bowling lineup of Dillon, Collymore, Collins and Edwards. The same goes for Roach.

  • Runs Per Wicket by West Indian Pacers in 2000-2005: 33.84
  • Runs Per Wicket by West Indian Pacers in 2018: 26.36

Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka is the only team in which the quality of fast bowling got more powerless compared to the previous period.

Chaminda Vaas, by far the best fast-bowler produced by his country, was the lead bowler of the 00-05 fast-bowling attack of Sri Lanka (193 wickets with an average of less than 30).

On the other hand, Lakmal was the lead bowler during the current era, taking 72 wickets with an average of less than 25 to justify the given tag. However, the support he gets from other pacers from his side is quite mediocre as all the other ones average above 30 in the interval, some even above the mark of 35.

  • Runs Per Wicket by Sri Lankan Pacers in 2000-2005: 32.64
  • Runs Per Wicket by Sri Lankan Pacers since 2018: 33.81

England

England has an attack of Hoggard, Flintoff, Harmison and Caddick in the starting 5 years of this century, with Gough and Jones just behind them in the wickets tally.  If we compare it to the current attack of Anderson, Broad, Woakes, Wood, and Stokes, the numbers will deviate the pendulum towards the current one. 

Anderson since 2018, is much better than any English Pacer version of 00-05; nearly the same goes with Broad; both have picked up more than 100 wickets with an average of less than 25, while on the other side, the 6 pacers with at least 50 wickets in the prior period have an average of 30.07,30.89, 28.71, 30.21, 27.42, 28.23.

  • Runs Per Wicket by England Pacers in 2000-2005: 29.76
  • Runs Per Wicket by England Pacers since 2018: 26.64

South Africa

Pollock, Ntini, Kallis and Nel are the top 4 wicket-takers for SA in the primary time of this century; Rabada, Philander, Ngidi and Nortje are the ones in the other. 

Pollock was deadly in the previous period, used to take a wicket for every 23 runs conceded or 60 balls bowled; Rabada, the leader of the current attack, just gives the same amount of runs per wicket but he is getting a wicket in every 43 balls in the current era.

Going with their numbers, both will give almost the same runs to take 10 wickets (Rabada will give 8 less though) but Rabada will do this in 72 overs, compared to Pollock’s 100 overs.

Now, Philander, Ngidi and Nortje (23.59) formed a better attack than Kallis, Ntini and Nel (29.74), a special thanks to Kallis’s average of 33 in the duration.

  • Runs Per Wicket by South African Pacers in 2000-2005: 28.86
  • Runs Per Wicket by Proteas Fast-Bowlers since 2018: 24.05

Pakistan

Shoaib Akhtar in the first 5 years of this century was a nightmare for the batsmen; he was better than any of Pakistan’s current Test bowlers in terms of performances in our selected periods.

Akhtar averages around 20 and strikes in every 37 balls, but the support he got was the reason that the current attack of Pak is much better, which will be proved by the numbers themselves.

Waqar, Razzaq and Sami are the supporting cast for Akhtar; these 3 bowlers average 27.91, 36.74, and 46.12 in the period. On another side, the 3 main pacers of the current attack (Shaheen, Hasan and Abbas) average 23.89, 23.59 and 21.07 since 2018.

  • Runs Per Wicket by Pakistan Pacers in 2000-2005: 31.27
  • Runs Per Wicket by Pakistan Pacers since 2018: 26.64

Bangladesh

On 10 Nov 2000, The Team of Tigers played their first test under the captaincy of Naimur Rahman; they lost it by 9 wickets, almost 4 years later (10 Jan 2005); they won their first Test, which remained the only test match they won in our selected period (2000-2005) out of 40.

In an ideal scenario, to win all 40 matches, they should have taken 800 wickets, but they got just 348.

In terms of pace bowling in their attack, not a single pacer has picked up at least 50 wickets for Bangladesh in Test cricket in both periods. All the pacers combined have taken fewer than 100 Test wickets since 2018.

  • Runs Per Wicket by Bangladesh Pacers in 2000-2005: 57.71
  • Runs Per Wicket by Bangladesh Pacers since 2018: 47.67

The team that just picked 348 wickets in its first 40 tests (9 wickets per match), has now taken 334 wickets in 24 matches (14 wickets per match) since 2018. A major reason for the spike of win% from 2.5 % to 25%.

The deep demonstration of fast-bowling attacks from all the teams in both eras is over; only Sri Lanka has declined in terms of fast-bowling attack quality; Aus, Pak, Eng, SA and WI fast bowling attack has remained almost as good as the previous one or improved; Ban, NZ and Ind attacks got much more lethal and deep.

So the current era has much better fast-bowling attacks and much deeper, at least the numbers show that!!

  • Runs Per Wicket by Pacers in 2000-2005: 32.72
  • Runs Per Wicket by Pacers since 2018: 26.49

Changes in Pitches: The Journey From Roads to Results

Pitches offered during the period of 2000-2005 are considerably more supportive of batsmen than pitches presented in Test cricket since 2018. 

Those pitches were neither better for the general viewers of the game; an average person who spends his 5 days of infinite worth should have a feeling at the end, either satisfaction (if his team won) or disappointment (in the opposite scenario), simply for the growth of viewers in test cricket, test cricket should end in either favour.

This is what has been happening since 2018. The chart below shows that the probability of a decisive result in a test match (in the favour of a team) has increased by around 13%.

For improvement, some have to sacrifice; batsmen are “some” in this case. They have to sacrifice by paying the price for much more bowling-friendly wickets than the batsmen of previous generations. 

The chart below shows that every metric related to batting just declined at a more than decent rate, with less 400+ scores, a 26% decrease in hundred(s) per match, and each and every number which quantifies batting has declined.

The result of which is that their batting numbers will not be as high as the previous ones, even if the two batsmen are equally good. 

There are 25% of batsmen with 1000+ runs used to average 50 or higher during 2000-2005; if we slightly lower our criteria to 40, 55% of batsmen will fulfil it.

However, since 2018, just 40% of batsmen with 1000+ runs, average more than 40, and just 11% average more than 50. So the chances of being a batsman with 1000 Test runs with an average of 50 since 2018 are 56% less than what they were in the 2000-2005 time frame.

That’s it, the explanation of both the reasons are given, and the verdict is simple: Current batsman averaging less in the longest form of cricket as compared to some batsmen of the recent past is because of playing against better and much deeper bowling attacks and playing on pitches which are prepared for results, not for batsmanship!!

Hope you liked this article, as usual, share it on social media platforms and share your opinions regarding this article or your own reasons for the depletion of batting averages in the comment section.

The ODI Batting Evolution: Part 1

In many of our previous articles, we talked about how ODI cricket has drastically changed throughout the years. 

  • In the 70s, an average player batting in the top 7 used to average 27.37 by striking at less than 62 in ODI cricket; in the last decade, the average rose to 33.83, and now the scoring rate is 82.92. 
  • 430 runs were scored in an average ODI match in the 2010s; for the 70s, the same number went down to 345.

The change is simply enormous, the result of some significant differences.   

This article aims to describe some of these changes by illustrating some of the key events and players that shaped ODI batting into what it is today. 

The WSC Revolution

In 1977, Kerry Packer introduced World Series Cricket (WSC) with revolutionary ideas such as floodlit matches, white-coloured balls, and coloured kits, which changed the course of cricket forever. 

At its inception, Packer wasn’t allowed to use any of the traditional cricket grounds in the country and had to resort to hosting his matches at non-cricket grounds, which gravely affected the popularity of WSC as people remained uncertain about the quality of the pitches in these grounds.  

In a bid to increase viewership, Packer experimented with the idea of day-night matches under floodlights.

This bold move, later regarded by legendary commentator Tony Grieg as a masterstroke, brought unprecedented changes in the promotion and coverage of cricket and drastically improved the game’s popularity in the coming years.

This novel approach required a different kind of ball, as red-coloured balls would have limited visibility in the night sky, and this fostered the use of white balls, which have since become the standard choice for a limited-over game. 

Tight schedules and exceptional competition meant that players became fitter and more skilled, resulting in higher-quality cricket being played. 

Other innovations include the implementation of fielding circles and the first widespread use of helmets. All these additions and changes have ensured that the impact and legacy of the World Series Cricket last forever.

The 80s: The Decade of Greats

The 80s were cluttered with batting and bowling talent alike. Within this sea of talent, three names stand out for their invaluable contribution to the development of batting in ODI cricket. 

The first and most prominent name is Sir Vivian Richards, the King and the original Master Blaster. 

With scything cuts and devastating pulls, he unleashed a wave of unprecedented terror among captains and bowlers alike, all while nonchalantly chewing his gum, emanating an aura of unmatched swagger.

The second name is that of Zaheer Abbas, one blessed with equally good timing and divine stroke play. 

He drove with surgical precision and found seemingly nonexistent gaps with prolific ease. Both players had impossible strike rates compared to their era. 

They set standards, admittedly impossible standards for that time, but standards nevertheless inspired players around the world. 

Players were more confident in playing their shots, and although they weren’t quite as successful, the change in mindset was enough to amplify strike rates worldwide.

The last name was neither as destructive as Viv Richards nor as refined as Zaheer Abbas. 

However, he was just as effective by simply picking the gaps and using the large boundaries to his advantage. 

Dean Jones retired with the third-highest average in ODI cricket, and although this landmark has been breached by many since then, his style of play will forever remain etched in cricketing history. 

He redefined the art of running between the wickets as he regularly tapped the ball into gaps with soft hands and stole extra runs from right under the nose of the fielder. 

This rotation of strikes allowed the smooth flow of an innings, safely releasing all the pressure built by the opposition as they felt the game slipping away from them with every passing run. 

His free-flowing nature was adopted and acknowledged by many contemporaries and future greats as a highly effective method for a run chase. Middle-order batters strived to achieve his level of running, in turn making them fitter and better players. 

Jayasuriya and the Powerplay 

Powerplay was another indirect product of the World Series Cricket. 

Although field restrictions were first used in South African domestic cricket, the WSC brought the idea into the spotlight. 

Field restrictions were first introduced to allow batsmen to hit more boundaries and take more risks which can spice up the game and hence increase viewership. 

For example, in a close match where 15 runs are needed off 6 balls, the bowler could simply push all his fielders to the boundary and ensure that the batsman’s hands are tied, and more often than not, this guaranteed the victory of the bowling team. 

Field restrictions were meant to dull this edge of the bowlers. 

Eventually, field restrictions found their way to the mainstream game, and soon no more than 2 fielders were allowed outside the 30-yard circle for the first 15 overs and then 5 fielders for the rest of the game. 

However, the exceptional quality of pace bowling of that era combined with pitches that generally favoured bowlers meant that sometimes the field restrictions had the opposite effect on batsmen, where they stopped taking risks in the powerplay and instead tried to survive through the first phase of 15 overs, as even a slight error of judgment can result in the batsman losing his wicket to a catch at gully, covers or short midwicket. 

This effect was exponentially increased due to the prowess of legendary bowlers such as Malcolm Marshall, Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Craig McDermott, and the all-rounder quartet of that era, who, when coupled with the bowling perks of the new ball, produced devastating spells at great frequency. 

However, where most batsmen saw a testing period laced with deadly bowlers and a close-knit of prowlers waiting to gobble up any edges from innocent pokes or naive cover drives, one captain saw an opportunity. 

During the 1992 World Cup, the revolutionary Kiwi captain, Martin Crowe, sent Mark Greatbatch, who usually batted at 5, to open the innings. 

He told him to be “positive and generate some momentum”. 

This move turned out to be a masterstroke as the burly left-hander tonked the ball to all parts of the ground in brute fashion, taking complete advantage of the field restrictions. 

New Zealand went on to reach the semifinals: one of the critical reasons for this was the exploitation of powerplay. 

However, in the next edition of the World Cup, the cricketing world indeed beheld the full potential of this tactic.

Sri Lanka was rocked by a bomb attack, and its cricket board was reeling on the shores of bankruptcy when it entered the World Cup of 96. 

Hence, there were few who gave them any chance of reaching the playoffs, let alone winning the prized trophy. 

However, what transpired next was an extraordinary show of grit, resolve, and camaraderie, which ended with Sri Lanka being crowned the World Champions. 

Captain Ranatunga and newly appointed coach Dav Whatmore designed elaborate and precise plans specifically for the tournament, one of which was to open with the pair, Jayasuriya-Kaluwitharna.

Jayasuriya and Kaluwitharna, both lower-order batters before the World Cup, were sent up the order to fully use the powerplay restrictions. 

They were both given the insurance to go after the bowling and the captain’s protection, who promised not to drop them. 

With their positions secure, both batsmen unleashed a wave of fury and destruction, the likes of which had never been seen before. They cut and pulled and drove and slogged, never letting the opposition settle and wearing down the bowlers and fielders both physically and mentally. 

At a time when 250 was considered a daunting total, Sri Lanka passed 100 runs thrice in 6 innings before the end of the powerplay, with Jayasuriya scoring 221 runs at a stunning strike rate of 132

He was awarded the man of the tournament, after which he continued to open the innings and scored a truckload of runs at a brisk rate. 

He revolutionized powerplay batting and took ball striking to a whole new level, paving the way for the emergence of many other aggressive openers such as Adam Gilchrist, Virender Sehwag, and Herschelle Gibbs. 

DC vs RCB: Match Preview, Prediction and Dream11 Teams For Match 27 of IPL 2022

RCB will face off against the Delhi Capitals in match 27 of this year’s IPL. Delhi come from an all-around performance against KKR as they performed exceedingly well in all departments to get them a win by a huge margin.

RCB walk into this fixture after a loss against CSK as they conceded 215 with no control over the ball in the last 10 overs conceding close to 155 runs in the last 10 overs alone which is concerning by any means. 

With a top-order failure in the powerplay, RCB had done well to recover as they had dispatched the bad balls while limiting the dot balls by converting the 1s and 2s

What will make RCB fans happier is that this effort was done by 2 youngsters against a top-class bowling attack.

Pitch Report:

Wankhede is where these 2 teams will lock their horns. A standard stadium for the Indian team and has seen a lot of IPL matches take place, teams will have a lot of data to work with regarding this venue. The curators have managed to keep a high grass covering to make sure the pitch holds on really well.

In the previous games, we have seen the ball grip and turn a lot which made it really hard for the batsmen to face the leg spinners but with enough pace on the surface, any full-length balls or short balls were easily put away.

The surface has been harder to bat on compared to the other venues. There is enough swing on offer that the new ball bowlers can exploit. Batsmen have struggled to use the powerplay efficiently and any team which has tried to take an aggressive route has lost a lot of wickets in the process. Teams batting first have looked for the boundaries more often than not and in the process have completely disregarded strike rotation.

Bowlers haven’t figured on what death overs to bowl as the pitch seems to get easier to play as the innings progress.

With both teams having very conventional bowlers, this will be a very interesting game for the viewers.

In-Depth Phase Wise Comparision

Powerplay → Faf and Anuj will be up against Khaleel and Mustafizur.

Both these bowlers are not bowlers who massively swing the ball but it’s about placing the ball in the right areas along with their left arm action that makes them a threat to batsmen.

Du Plessis has enjoyed playing at the Wankhede as he averages 40 with a healthy average of 131.

DC has managed to pick up at least a wicket in the powerplay so far and will be up against a duo who rarely give away their wicket in this period. 

RCB have a more explosive batting lineup with Maxi and Suyash involved, so continuing their current approach is not viable in any way as they have one of the lowest averages in the powerplay this season.

Rawat has shown intent but only when his strike rate starts to fall while Du Plessis seems to look for a feel of the conditions for a very long time. With a struggle for the top 3 batsmen against Kuldeep and their other economical spinners, we will see a more aggressive approach.

What will be interesting to watch is if they can play in an aggressive manner while also keeping wickets in hand, having batsmen available in the back end is what has made RCB chase down or set up a huge target,

In my opinion, we will see Anuj Rawat play more of a Shaw-Esque role where he will look to go after any traditional deliveries which he has the capability to do while Faf will also look at a more aggressive route.

With wickets falling in the powerplay and Anuj who has been under pressure with Suyash performing, I strongly feel DC will walk away as winners with the ball in this phase.

Prithvi Shaw has been an absolute monster in the powerplay so far!!! The ability to read the line and lengths so quickly and play with so much freedom is something we rarely see. 

What makes him really special is the fact that he doesn’t always need to swing his bat and hope the ball goes to the fence, he uses the field restrictions and more often than not plays shots with complete control. 

With a strike rate of 152 and 162 against the RCB quicks, he will be the player to watch out for. In a Mumbai track that will help him, I cannot see a change in approach.

Warner has been among the runs with his loss in the last game but doesn’t seem like his old self. Whenever a player of his level gets to face so many balls, they often demolish the bowlers especially when they have bowlers but Warner has had to rely on innovative shots to get to his scores. Taking nothing away from the batsmen, but he hasn’t been his usual self.

With a tidy record against the pacers and a slow middle over RR, we will see Delhi continue an approach that has worked so far.

Middle overs → RCB have the best middle order in the league with the addition of other batsmen and Shahbaz’s spin hitting ability proving its worth once again.

Kohli, Maxi, Suyash and Shahbaz will be eager to come back on the field after the last game.

Shahbaz has been able to use the pace of the bowlers but his spin hitting ability wasn’t well known which was a concern as with DK waiting and him playing up the order he had to face a lot of spin. 

Against CSK, not only did he play well against spin he didn’t take too many risks. He used any space given to him and minimized the number of dots.

Suyash is someone RCB have been impressed with over the past year or 2 and after finally starting his first game, he did nothing less than impressing the entire fanbase.

Powerful shots with a 360-degree range of hitting are what make him special.

The duo had a huge target against them and had managed to turn 1 into 2’s and never looked out of place which is something we very often see in youngsters.

Maxi has been on fire, with an amazing bbl season and a rocking start to the season where he took apart CSK’s bowling in the few balls that he had faced.

Maxwell will be up against Axar who has a trait that is quite similar to Jadeja and is causing Maxi some problems. The ball for both these bowlers seems to skid on more than others and when the ball does come straight off the arm and has no spin, the position maxi gets into makes it very hard for him to adapt.

Maxi vs Kuldeep has been a very volatile matchup. With only a small sample size of 14 balls, Maxi has hit 5 boundaries with the southpaw getting his wicket twice.

Kohli in Wankhede is enough to make him a threat. Having not been in great form he will be looking to score some runs and if RCB are fortunate enough to have a good powerplay it will make it more comfortable for him to express himself in the middle.

Despite having in-form Kuldeep the sheer depth and quality of the players will mean that RCB will look to score most of their runs in this phase of the innings.

Before I start talking about DC let me just put up a stat for you, DC HAS the LOWEST STRIKE RATE AGAINST SPIN AT 6.71. 

Normally this would indicate the lack of quality or that the team looks at other phases to score but if only it was that simple.

Pant, Yadav and Powell in the middle overs just haven’t worked so far. Lalit’s batting position isn’t confirmed as he keeps moving. 

Without undermining Lalit’s contribution but having a Lalit Yadav as your best middle-order batsman this season is a very big concern. Pant is struggling to rotate the strike and often has to take the risky route to ease the situation. Any overseas batsmen will struggle on a subcontinent pitch with quality spinners.

Having seen a more submissive Pant since his captaincy debut, Dc will need to rethink their strategy as they will be up against the spin trio of Hasaranga, Shahbaz and Maxwell.

Maxwell’s experience along with Shahbaz’s accuracy will make it hard for DC to score quick runs against these 2 who are expected to bowl a combined 4 overs. Hasaranga is getting better as time passes with no major change in his game plan which is a good thing as it shows optimum clarity.

With RCB leaking too many runs last time around, we can see them playing it a bit more safe and bowling lengths which don’t give too many runs forcing the initiative on the DC trio to score runs in this phase.

Death overs → Dc have some quality Indian batsmen to finish things off, something which I feel should be employed by all IPL teams. 

With a feel for the conditions and some power, it will be an attack that RCB will have to be careful with. 

Having failed so far, they will have a point to prove as they go up against an attack that has also failed so far.

Hazlewood, Siraj and Harshal will have to take care of these batsmen. With Siraj getting back in form along with Hazlewood who has continued to be as accurate as ever, RCB will look at this as a favourable matchup.

Having a lot of quality bowlers means that if the batting team ever loses sight of their initiative the result will not end well. DK continues to wreak havoc as he had a good cameo against CSK. With Harshal back they will be happy to have another capable player to assist these bowlers.

RCB will be happy to have Harshal the batsman back. With both him and Wanindu, DK will have more freedom to go after every ball and with an extra batsman, we will also see support. 

DC has been really brave so far by bowling standard lengths and backing the bowler’s skill sets. With their bowling working out as an overall package it will be unfair to say that they have underperformed.

Important Players

RCB → Harshal Patel and Glenn Maxwell

Harshal will be available for the game and I think he will be starting this one. With DC having a low strike rate against spin, they will look at Harshal as an option to get runs. 

With a more stable death bowling, we could see Harshal more in the middle overs against a team that will be looking to get many runs in this phase.

Harshal now has a chance to both get lots of wickets while continuing to maintain his economy of 5.6 which makes him the best option to become your Dream XI captain.

Maxwell will always be important with his X-factor but even so now as he has to face Kuldeep. 

With Kuldeep’s resurgence in this season’s IPL, batsmen will have a more conservative approach and in the off chance that someone gets a chance to hit him for a six, he comes back with an even better ball. 

What has made Maxi special is his ability to continue hitting these shots even with the bowler improvising? Maxwell will be back after the CSK game where he hit very good CSK spinners away. 

With Akash Deep set to be dropped for Harshal and the pitch griping on we might see him bowl and over or 2 with the ball.

DC → Kuldeep Yadav and Prithvi Shaw

With the ball gripping on and the chinaman being in top form, it is not an unexpected choice to be one of DC’s main players today. 

With RCB playing an extra batsman, we will see at least 1 batsman go after the spinner and more often than not I feel we will see Kuldeep come out as the winner.

Shaw has been in top form as he absolutely demolishes any bowler in the powerplay. Reading the line and length faster and always having the exact idea of how much the ball bounces is a skill very few possess. 

Having been given a license to go after the bowlers, he will try his best to repeat the same against RCB. This will be a very interesting clash as he is up against Siraj and Hazlewood. 

These 2 pacers have been bowlers who have been very consistent with their staple lengths and so far have not shifted away from the plan but with Shaw going after these balls, I feel he will lose his wicket but not before he can land a few blows on the players. 

If Hasaranga does bowl in the powerplay, he has been bowling bad lengths which would only increase the run rate.

Key Matchups

DC vs RCB Dream11 Team

MI vs LSG: Match Preview, Prediction and Dream11 Teams For Match 26 of IPL 2022

The Most Successful Team in the history of the league will be facing a team that is playing its debut season. The stories in this season are quite opposite, Mumbai Indians, even after playing 4 matches failed to register a win in the points table. Lucknow in the same number of matches registered 6 points on the table. 

Lucknow is coming in this game, after a close encounter against Rajasthan, where their own decision of sending Marcus Stoinnis at 8th position cost them the match. 

Pitch Venue Report

The match will be played in Brabourne Stadium, Mumbai. A venue that is quite favourable for batsmen both historically and recently. In the 5 matches played on this venue so far in IPL 2022, 1st innings scores of 177, 210, 180, 189 and 215 are recorded, and 3 out of the 5 times, these totals got chased.

Coming specifically to afternoon games on this venue, with less swing and almost no dew, the role of spinners has increased drastically, in comparison with night games. In the 2 afternoon matches we witnessed on this venue, Spinners got as many wickets as Fast Bowlers even by bowling around just 38% of total overs. A pacer is getting a wicket per 22 balls, whereas a spinner just takes 14 balls to do the same. 

Probable Playing XI

Mumbai Indians

Ishan Kishan (wk), Rohit Sharma, Suryakumar Yadav, Dewald Brevis, Tilak Verma, Kieron Pollard, Fabien Allen, Jaydev Unadkat, Murugan Ashwin, Jasprit Bumrah, Tymal Mills, 

Lucknow Super Giants

Quinton de Kock (wk), KL Rahul (c), Deepak Hooda, Ayush Badoni, Marcus Stonnis, Krunal Pandya, Jason Holder, Krishnaspa Gowtham, Andrew Tye, Ravi Bishnoi, Avesh Khan

Important Players

KL Rahul: Even though that Lucknow’s Captain has not performed much in the 5 matches till now, He is by far the most prolific run-getter in the last 4 seasons (2018-2021) of IPL by scoring 2548 runs with an average of 62. His consistency in this format is remarkable, and with having great matchups against all the Mumbai Bowlers, he has a chance to play up to his potential in this game.

Ravi Bishnoi: As mentioned in the Pitch Report, Spinners in terms of wickets (or dream 11 points) have provided more value than fast bowlers and with both the MI openers averaging less than 30 against Right-Arm LegBreak Bowlers (in IPL). 

Ishan Kishan: 15.25 crore, the most expensive player in IPL Auction that too by a margin of 1 crore, has not lived up to his expectations or the price offered. 

In this IPL season so far, He has scored 178 runs with an average of 44 but the scoring rate of these runs is a major issue for his team. He scored these runs with a strike rate of 122. His way of batting will have a major impact on the success of Mumbai.

I preferred him over Rohit Sharma due to matchups and the fact that he is a wicketkeeper which can you give you points worth 10-20 runs just by this.

Jasprit Bumrah: The Bowling Quality of Sharma’s Army has reduced significantly compared to previous years. They have remained with just one wicket-taking fast bowler, Bumrah. 

Rohit’s usage of him will play a decisive role in the result of this match, especially when they are against a side with quality batting. Considering LSG’s heavy top order and Rohit’s way of captaincy, Bumrah will most probably bowl 2 overs within the powerplay. One (if required) in the 2nd middle overs phase, or unless 2 in the death. 

Bowling in death means there are high chances of getting wickets, which makes Bumrah a great option to consider as Captain or Vice-Captain in your Fantasy XI, especially in the case of Mumbai Bowling First.

Some Important Numbers/Trivia

  • Bumrah is yet to take a wicket at Brabourne Stadium and bowled with an economy of 11.86 (2 matches)
  • Kieron Pollard averages less than 22 and never scored a 50 at this venue (8 Matches)

Key Matchups

MI vs LSG Dream11 Team

CSK vs RCB: Match Preview, Prediction and Dream11 Teams For Match 22 of IPL 2022

RCB have a chance to go on top of the table as they are set to face CSK in match 22 of this season’s IPL.

RCB will have to change venues yet again as they move back to DY Patil stadium.

They showed a lot of courage and executed their plans really well in the previous game against Mumbai Indians. Hard lengths along with subtle variations to expose the weakness of each batsman meant that they had a below-par total to chase.

SKY’s onslaught over the bowlers should not be something RCB should worry about as they had bowled according to the plan and it was more to do with Surya’s execution.

We might have also seen the most mature batting performance this season. With the pitch holding up and MI bowling pitch-perfect lengths, RCB relied on strike rotation and looked to use any pace given to them to target the gaps which meant they reached the target with little to no risk being taken.

Without Harshal Patel and a new face in the bowling lineup, it will be interesting to see if they are as accurate as they have been this season.

CSK on the other hand was blown away by SRH with both the bat and ball.

They have been known not to make changes, but with their season falling apart, will they look at other options on the bench as uncertainties about Deepak’s availability continue to grow?

Pitch Report/Analysis

DY Patil has changed a lot since RCB last played. The pitch seems much more dead but isn’t breaking apart, indicating a strong presence of grass but enough to help the bowlers.

The pitch has been supporting the bowlers with enough turn and the ball keeping its line which really troubles the batsmen. It is not gripping as much as the other pitches.

The pace of the ball is being used as well as the carry, that we usually get, is not there anymore. With the pitch’s bouncy nature it is easier to dispatch the ball. The fuller lengths are being given no mercy with the ball going to all parts of the ground when it is being bowled there.

The excess pace is the only kind of bowling that yields no dividends as there has been no success so far and as time passes it will only get worse.

The T20 fundamentals still work. Batsmen should take their time to settle and should continue to use explosive choices in the middle to increase their CRR.

This pitch reminds me of the Rajiv Gandhi stadium which has a batting surface with enough assistance to the bowler to keep the competition alive.

Phase Wise Comparision

Powerplay → RCB’s batting will be up against Theekshana and Choudhary. Choudhary tends to bowl a fuller length which shouldn’t work. 

Theekshana’s role will be interesting to watch. He bowls much flatter than the usual spinner and has high control which will force batsmen to be innovative and depend on their feet moving to tackle his bowling. 

I feel RCB will walk out as winners with Rawat being in top form and not losing any wickets in the powerplay to an MI bowling attack that had lots of variation will mean that this duo will be favourites walking into this clash.

Gaikwad continues to struggle with Uthappa having a rare failure in the powerplay. With spinners proving to be lethal, RCB might look to Maxi or Shahbaz to pitch in with an over or 2. 

Siraj has been missing his lengths so far and overseas internationals are struggling to hit the ground up and running. 

Strictly from a statistical standpoint RCB shouldn’t give them too many runs and maybe pitch in with a wicket or 2. 

RCB have so far not been able to bowl very tight lengths and instead have gotten wickets through batsmen going too hard at the ball. 

Based on form and overall merit, I think both of them will have an equal chance to succeed in this part of the game.

Middle overs → Virat Kohli, Maxi and Shahbaz will be against a rather mediocre CSK bowling lineup. 

With DJ Bravo containing runs won’t be a problem but pairing that along with wicket-taking deliveries is what makes a team successful which CSK have so far not been able to do. 

Ali and Jadeja troubled RCB last year but have been nothing more than ordinary this year. 

The usage of Chris Jordan is also not clear as he is being asked to bowl regular seamer lengths which are not his strongest trait. 

With Theekshana we could see Jordan operating more in the middle overs trying to replicate the role DJ Bravo and Harshal Patel have been doing so far which is mixing up lengths and adding lots of variation.

Kohli seems to be back with a well-made 48 where he rotated the strike and played some risk-free shots, confirming RCB’s victory before he got out to a wrong call by the 3rd umpire.

Strike rotation seems to be a problem on this pitch as batsmen either get juicy full-length balls or struggle to find room and have to take the aerial route, the solution which has been pioneered by Virat. 

Maxwell, the player has the uncanny ability to have a high strike rate even while struggling to adapt to the pitch.

360 range of shots with high match awareness makes him a threat to every single team and his vast experience means that he works well with almost every kind of player. 

With the pitch still proving to be a threat we might not see the huge 100 runs in the middle, but anything less than 70-80 will be an under-par score for this pair.

Ali, Rayudu and Dube, are very good strikers of the ball and have the ability to dispatch the ball out of the ground with power alone. Their struggle against certain kinds of bowlers is very visible tho.

Ali is a well-rounded player whose match awareness is one of his most valuable assets. The ability to read the game so well and change gears is what has made him successful so far and with a 50 in the last game, he will be the batsman to get out for the RCB bowlers.

Rayudu and Dube have limited footwork and struggle to read any sort of variations. 

Hasaranga will have the edge over both of them with his clever deception and change of pace. 

Rayudu has struggled with the short ball and Dube has little to no room as he never moves his feet which is something Akash deep will take advantage off.

Shahbaz’s ability is still not certain as he has bowled well but has always looked to keep a low economy more than wicket-taking balls, which is always worrying for a youngster.

RCB walkout clear favourites in this part.

Slog overs → Without Harshal Patel RCB will look to Sid Kaul to bowl these overs. 

Having improved quite a bit, he will be looking forward to impressing the management with his skills but it will be a very hard task. 

Hazlewood’s form is something we are not sure about and Siraj has been bowling lengths that even debutants don’t bowl.

This trio’s performance on the day will be under a dark cloud of uncertainty as they will be up against India’s finest ever finisher(Dhoni), India’s most informed finisher(Jadeja) and a huge tail that wags when it is asked to.

Without a change in fortune for these bowlers, CSK will look to capitalize and gain as many runs as possible in this phase of the game.

Over the past so many seasons we have seen teams spend a lot for experienced players who have done well in IPL before. 

With skill being an obvious factor in this equation, it’s also about how much teams value players who they can always rely on.

With everything going wrong with the bowling lineup and RCB batsmen having batsmen who are very explosive, DJ will be CSK’s go-to man to stop any sort of onslaughts on their bowling attack. 

His contribution may not make enough difference if the rest don’t pitch in but his success with the ball is all but guaranteed in this match.

Key Matchups

CSK vs RCB Dream 11 Team

RCB vs MI: Match Preview, Prediction and Dream11 Teams For Match 18 of IPL 2022

As we head into match 18 of the IPL we have Royal Challengers Bangalore facing off against out-of-form Mumbai Indians.

RCB and MI have been 2 superstar teams and when they face off against each other we have always seen a lot of excitement from the demolition of ABD and Kohli to MI winning it after snatching the victories with some serious power-hitting.

The match will be taking place in Pune and today I will talk about

  • How the pitch is acting so far
  • Key Matchups 
  • Important Players
  • Some predictions related to the match
  • Dream11 Teams

The venue has only seen 3 games so far with an average first innings score of about 180.

The pitch seems to hold up initially which makes the powerplay a hard place to bat in, especially if there are quality pace bowlers present.

Gill’s innings will be the blueprint for how batsmen should structure their innings.

The bounce is somewhat predictable but with the pitch having 2 faces along with the good length causing trouble teams have not really figured out the perfect way to build their innings here. 

Playing the long innings is key in any form of the game but in a t20 game the risk-reward factor is proving to be a headache so far, to help their experienced players play longer we have seen batsmen attempt to take on the opposition quickly in all these games with certain failures and success.

Spinners and powerplay bowlers have so far been the most effective bowlers here.

There is enough on offer to keep the batsmen guessing and the seam movement and pace variation initially are proving to be a big headache for all opening batsmen.

Phase Wise Comparision

Powerplay→ RCB’s opening duo so far has been built on their composure and picking out bad balls. MI have the swing of Sams and the clever variations of Mills are what they will be up against.

RCB will clearly win this part of the game as their openers have been very smart in dealing with all kinds of powerplay situations. They don’t risk their wickets and have been scoring at a good rate against all kinds of bowlers. With this pitch, the best way would be to stay put and keep wickets in hand which makes their job easier. MI bowlers have been missing their lengths and unless all of them as a unit have to build up pressure to get any sort of result.

Jasprit Bumrah will bowl in the powerplay which is something RCB have to be careful with. Bumrah produces magic balls at any time we should have a conservative approach against him.

Mi has 2 experienced players in Kishan and Rohit. Willey, Siraj and Akash deep will be the bowlers RCB will use.

MI has been really slow and with the need to play longer innings we might see yet another conservative start from their openers. RCB Pacers have the swing, pace and bounce in their bowlers to trouble these batsmen. With Brevis coming in later the odds are yet against stacked on RCB’s side with only one problem of them leaking too many runs which I will talk about later.

Middle overs→ RCB will be the team to beat in this phase with the Big show back in the XI for this match. Kohli, Maxwell, Willey and Shahbaz against Ashwin, Sams and the part-time bowler.

As I mentioned in my previous article they will cover all bases with Ashwin being mi’s biggest asset. He has switched to unusual lines and is the only bowler who can get those rapid wickets.

Brevis, SKY and Tilak will be the batsmen for MI and if they do manage to win the match it will be because of them. Fearless approach, smart batting and partnerships are the bases this trio covers. They are not scared to step out and SKY’s ability as a batsman doesn’t need any introduction. Hasaranga so far has been a hit and miss with too many bad balls in his spells which the Mi batsmen will definitely take advantage of. Shahbaz hasn’t been able to bowl too many overs and the odds will be stacked against him if he does come on to bowl at this crucial time. Akash deeps last over and pollard being in the XI will force him to bowl out early. Sky’s versatility will be his main problem with the batsmen being skilful enough to move the ball to all parts of the ground.

With these batsmen looking in fine touch I certainly don’t see the RCB bowlers doing anything special in this phase which means MI will walk out as winners.

Slog overs → Dinesh Karthik blew apart Rajasthan as they looked clueless with his masterful batting. Harshal can also help with the bat along with the middle order batsmen pitching in will be against a bowling lineup that loses most of its games in this phase. The bowlers are missing their lengths and for a rare good ball bowled there will be 2 half volleys being bowled.

One can’t be kind to this attack as they are creating problems with their horrific execution.

The mental aspect of this is another troubling factor as Rohit cant bowl out all his bowlers over the fear that it will come back to haunt them in death.

Pollard with a license to demolish is probably the scariest thing for a bowler and this won’t change for RCB. Siraj has proven that he can bowl according to plan but nothing has clicked so far.

Key Players for Both Teams 

Mumbai Indians → Jasprit Bumrah, Surya Kumar Yadav

Jasprit Bumrah is a bowler who can trouble any batsman at any point of time. The high pace and accuracy of the highest order are what make him special. If these 2 aspects alone don’t scare batsmen he has been bowling variations that will scare any batsmen.

Rohit’s usage of Bumrah is something that has amazed me so far. It really shows his skill as a captain with his plan. Bumrah’s 4 overs are spread over all across the innings and so far he has managed to create an impact with every single ball. He creates pressure on the batsmen even when they score at a high RPO. He gets wickets of centurions and keeps every batsmen silent in the death.

Rohit’s man-management is something every captain can learn from and Bumrah seems like the only player in their squad who can make a breakthrough and create pressure on the batsmen.

Surya has just returned from an injury but was quick to get back amongst the runs as he has already scored his first 50 of the season. Aggressive against spin and ability to move the ball to all parts of the ground is how Surya scores his runs. Hasaranga has been bowling bad balls regularly and is struggling to find a staple length by being too predictable or bowling bad deliveries in general. Akash deep will have to bowl in the middle, especially with Willey bowling upfront. The excess pace and bounce along with Cummins’s onslaught of pacers certainly mean that if MI wants to target a bowler it will be Akash. Shahbaz hasn’t bowled much to be used as a reliable backup if these bowlers fail.

Royal Challengers Banglore → Harshal Patel and Glenn Maxwell

Harshal continues to impress anyone and will be a crucial player in any team that he plays for but this game will be more important than others for him. MI have a strong opening pair with finishers who can single-handedly win the game. Harshal being asked to bowl from the 9th over would mean that he could potentially be put up against a set opener or the finishers like Pollard. His dot ball pressure along with wicket-taking ability will be a good indicator on who comes out on top as a good Harshal spell would certainly mean that at least 1 part of MI’s batting has been neutralised.

This is in no way from his record against MI last season as I think it’s both pointless and stupid to use those stats as MI has a new lineup with different conditions with their blue jersey being the only common point between these years.

RCB have been losing wickets in the middle over and there has been a slow run rate at this part of the innings. Maxwell will be very important as our opening pair has been able to go at a good rate, Kohli can use the extra time to settle in and the finishers will benefit from a better platform with Shahbaz and DK striking the pacers well. More than Maxwell’s score alone his influence in the middle will make it easier for other players to play their roles in a more efficient manner.

I think RCB head into this tie as favourites for obvious reasons.

If RCB wins the toss I see them having a 65% chance of winning the game and if MI wins the toss it would go down to 55% but with RCB still as favourites.

MI is not a team to take lightly as they have players who can alone cause havoc and with their pacers getting more game time we might also see a better performance.

RCB on the other hand have seen results fall in their favour but have been pathetic so far in the field. Misfields have been on a high and the bowlers are struggling to bowl accurately.

It’s one thing giving runs because the batsmen are better than the bowler on that day but gifting them runs is one thing RCB need to work on.

Siraj has been looking for too much from the wicket and is giving away runs by bowling balls drifting down the leg or with them being too short-pitched.

Record-high extras against PBKS, conceding 30 odd runs to tail-enders and having your star bowler getting dispatched by a batsman who has struggled in an innings have all been done by RCB this season.

RCB need to be smarter with how their bowlers execute their plans and gifting away runs every single game will eventually make them unworthy of any success.

To show how this has affected them, in the game against PBKS we had seen Siraj bowl an expensive powerplay over with too many wides some of which even ran off to the boundary, Hasaranga constantly lost his line and length and would bowl right into the batsmen’s arc leaving them no choice but to dispatch it. The drop catch of Odean Smith along with the other factors cost them the match against PBKS.

Against KKR they were all over their batting lineup but with Shahbaz bowling poor balls to Russell and conceding 30 to their tail-enders with multiple boundaries off the edge of the bat RCB had turned a potential 100-run score into a 129 target which almost cost them the match.

Having put a tight hold on RR, RCB had increased their target with 2 horrendous last overs. Wrong line and lengths along with a no-ball meant that RR had put 20 more runs on the board which really put RCB under pressure before DK came and solved the issue.

RCB had the players to win all these games with their planning but by gifting 20-30 runs every single game so far I just cannot see them making the playoff if this reckless bowling form continues. This is in no way a dig at the captaincy or the skill level of the bowlers as they have been able to bowl good deliveries but careless behaviour is the main problem they need to work on.

Key Matchups

Dream11 Team

Viv Richards: The Incomparable Genius

Sir Vivian Alexander Richards just celebrated his 70th birthday on March 7th. It is difficult to have an adjective that would do proper justice to his impact as a cricketing colossus. 

No batsman ever in terms of pure domination or ferocity penetrated intensity as Viv Richards who in full flow looked like a bomber destroying an airbase. –placing the best of attacks into submission. 

No batsman ever had such a sharp eye, who saw a cricket ball like a football. Viv took cricketing competitively or combat in sport to realms rarely ever scaled. 

The best-of-pace bowlers were taken apart in the manner of a sword ripping flesh by Viv, who delivered a knockout punch with a level of contempt and conviction unmatched. 

Even high-class bowlers looked like convicts crucified on a cross. When striding out onto the field no one more exuded the vibrations of an emperor in full command.

No one was ever an equally good exponent of the hook shot as Sir Viv. On the front foot he was an absolute champion, and even against express pacemen never wore a helmet. 

He could stretch so far forward he could place his left foot outside the line of off stump, eradicating the chance of lbw and formulating a leg stump line of his very own. Wherefrom he would remorselessly send the ball crashing through midwicket or coasting through extra cover. 

Even if appearing violent or destructive his strokes possessed shades of finesse, grace or artistry, and was not all brute power. In my view against express or pure pace, Viv was the best bat ever.

Brief Career Summary of The Undisputed Master

Viv made his debut in India in 1974-75, he scored 192 at Delhi in his 2nd match, but was hardly so consistent in the series, falling under the trap of Chandrasekhar.

In 1975-76 in Australia, he gave flashes of his brilliance with a string of useful scores in the final games, facing Jeff Thomson at his quickest. There were glimpses of the finest counter-attacking batting when he hooked Lillee and Thomson all over the place, scoring  101, 50 and 98 in his last 3 innings. West Indies were vanquished by a 5-1 margin, but an ornament was founded.

In 1976 at home against India Viv came into his own, scoring 3 centuries at an average of 92.5. His 142 at Barbados and 177 at Trinidad devoured the Indian spinners like no batsman ever.

The 1976 tour of England saw Viv Richards traversing realms in batting domination in regions of the sublime, emulating Sir Don Bradman more than anyone.

No West Indies batsman be it George Headley, Everton Weekes, Frank Worrell or Gary Sobers was as imperious or majestic as Viv. 

In many ways, Viv was like a medley of all those greats. His figures were staggering compiling 829 runs at an average of 118.42 with 3 centuries but more than the records it was the effortless ease with which he batted.

Viv demonstrated an aura of invincibility like an emperor plundering territory after territory. On his way to his 291 at Oval, no one ever looked more on the trail towards surpassing the world record Test score of 365 at that time. 

Never had batsmen on an English tour blended power and imagination to such a degree. I cannot forget his blazing cover drives and onside strokes. His 232 at Nottingham was a masterpiece on a difficult wicket. 

I doubt ever good or moving deliveries in England were treated with similar contempt as Viv. In 1976 he aggregated a record 1710 runs for a calendar year.

Viv was not successful in the home series against Pakistan in 1977, which was one of the hardest-fought contests. 

Still, in Kerry Packer’s World Series Cricket super tests he dominated the opposition in the manner of a combing operation of an army. No player ever displayed such an extent of superiority over his contemporaries, be it the Chappell brothers or Barry Richards. In the 1st year of 1977-78, he averaged 86.2 scoring 4 centuries, playing against Australia and the Rest of the World.

Arguably no overseas batsman ever was as majestic as Viv in Australia then. The likes of Dennis Lillee and Imran Khan were played like spinners. 

In 1978-79 in Australia and 1979 at home, Viv was not so prolific. Overall Viv scored 1281 runs at an average of 55 in WSC super tests with 170 as his highest score.

In the 1979 Prudential World cup, his match-winning knock of 138 in the final against England took batting audacity and temperament to rarely-scaled regions. Viv confirmed his prowess as a great match-winner.

On the 1979-80 tour of Australia in official test and ODI cricket, Viv batted even more majestically, He averaged 96.5 in the test matches and over 85 in the ODI triangular tournament. 

When scoring 140 in the Ist test at Brisbane,76 and 74 at Adelaide and 158 in an ODI against Australia, he took batting demolition to simply majestic heights almost unparalleled in Australia. 

No one in sheer onside play exhibited as much prowess or no overseas batsmen since Walter Hammond in 1929-30 was as much an epitome of consistency.

In England in 1980 even if not statistically so great averaging around 63, the manner he executed his run simply sent tremors in the camp of the opponents.

When scoring 145 at Lords and scoring 65 of 53 balls at Old Trafford he made the bowlers look as if they were walking towards a funeral. 

Although he failed at Oval and at Headingley rain robbed him of the opportunity to prove himself to his full capacity.

In Pakistan in 1980 on turning tracks, Viv displayed great skill averaging over 70. His 120 at Multan was one of the most majestic centuries on turning tracks. It was a revelation witnessing Viv tackle Imran at his fastest.

At home against England, he averaged above 85 including a classic 182 at Kensington Oval and 114 at Antigua.

In 1981-82 Viv’s form declined in Australia, although he was ever consistent in ODI’s. 

In 1983 in the home series against India he averages under 50, but was at his best when scoring a match-winning 61 not out at Kingston and a century at Georgetown, proving why he was head and shoulder above any batsmen.

In the 2nd half of the 1983 World Cup, he looked as invincible as ever when taking apart India, Australia and Pakistan, with respective scores of 119, 90* and 80*. 

Sadly in the final, he simply went overboard, when holing out to Kapil Dev for 33. Overall he averaged 73.60 in the tournament.

In India, in 1983-84 although overshadowed by Greenidge and skipper Clive Lloyd, batted like a king when scoring 120 at Mumbai and an unbeaten 149 in an ODI.

A home series versus Australia in 1984 was not so good in terms of consistency, but when scoring 178 in the final test blazed away like a Prairie fire.

On the English tour of 1984 made a spectacular start being virtually unstoppable when scoring an unbeaten 189 at Old Trafford in an ODI and 117 at Edgbaston. 

However, he lost form after the 2nd test and was overshadowed by Gordon Greenidge. 

When scoring 189 Viv virtually resurrected his side from the grave to achieve the pinnacle of glory, taking ODI batting genius to regions of divinity.

In Australia, in 1984-85 he was not so prolific but when scoring 208 at Melbourne in the 4th test, produced a masterpiece.

Career Since Becoming a Captain:

After inheriting the throne from Clive Lloyd as a skipper in 1985 although not as spectacular as before, Viv was an embodiment of consistency.

He averaged above 67 against New Zealand at home in 1985, above 60 against England at home in 1985-86, close to 50 in Pakistan in 1986, around 59 in India in 1987-8, 69 versus Pakistan at home in 1988, around 41 in England in 1988 and around 55 in Australia in 1988-89.

He relatively lost form from 1989 in series against India, England and Australia on home soil before making a recovery in his final series in England in 1991.

As a skipper he batted at his best when scoring a match-winning 108 at Delhi on a turning wicket, 146 at Perth in 1988-89, 125 at Trinidad v Pakistan in 1988, 110 at Antigua v England in 1985-86 and an unbeaten 73 at Edgbaston in 1991.

In 1985-86 in the manner of dynamite exploding scored a century of 56 balls against England. 

In a run chase, his unbeaten 108 at Delhi resembled a surgeon performing a successful operation against all odds while his 146 at Perth exhibited mastery on a difficult track.

Viv never lost a test series as a skipper and emulated his predecessor Clive Lloyd by leading his team to a series win in England and Australia. Unlike Clive he could not lead his team to series wins in India or Pakistan or to winning a world cup.

In county League tournaments like Gillette Cup, Viv played many a cavalier knock like his 117 in the 1979 final.

Is Viv Richards The Greatest Batsman of All Time?

Overall in his test career, Viv averaged 50.24, scoring 8,540 runs with 24 centuries in 121 test matches and 182 innings. 

However adding WSC Supertests Viv aggregated over 9200 runs with 28 centuries, at an average of 52. In ODI Viv scored 6721 runs at an average of 47 and a strike rate of 90.20.with 11 centuries.

What stands against Viv was his relative lack of consistency, in the 2nd half of his career and his not having had to face his own lethal pace bowlers. 

Unlike Gavaskar, Border, Lara and Tendulkar, Viv championed the cause of a world champion team and was not put to so much test in a crisis, to singlehandedly carry games on his shoulders. 

Viv was not also at his best against spin bowling and was foxed by the likes of Chandrashekar and Abdul Qadir. Without a doubt, Tendulkar and Lara were much better players of spin bowling.

Overall in mere test cricket by a whisker, the likes of Lara, Tendulkar and Sobers may just get the nod above Viv, when you consider batting averages and situations faced.

Technically Viv did not equal the likes of Barry Richards, Sachin Tendulkar or Greg Chappell and was not as graceful as Brian Lara or Zaheer Abbas. 

Based on mere statistics, Viv would not rank as the best ever after Bradman or the equal in test cricket of Tendulkar, Lara, Hobbs, Sobers, Steve Smith, Sunil Gavaskar or even Greg Chappell. 

Viv Richards was a perfect illustration of how statistics hardly tell the complete story as in a computer analysis where he may not rank even in the top 5 batsmen of all time overall and top 10 best ever in test cricket.

However, when one respects his relative impact on matches and the extent of demoralising opposition, no one was closer to him. 

Viv could change the complexion of the game more than anyone, being more intimidating than even Bradman. 

In Viv’s days, Greg Chappell had a better average and more centuries adding unofficial games and was more correct, but could never desecrate an attack in the manner of Viv or was equally imaginative. 

Sunil Gavaskar was statistically better than Viv, but not as good a match-winner or destroyer of pace bowling. Even with arguably equal potential as Viv, Barry Richards was not as completely tested in International Cricket.

Considering the standard of opposition and adding Packer cricket I will rank Viv in the peak period from 1975-76 to 1981 as the best after Bradman in the longest format of the game, who averaged 60.48 with 11 centuries. 

From 1976 to 1988 Viv averaged 55.31 scorings 7091 runs, by a whisker outscoring Greg Chappell. 

Overall, I will rate Viv as the best batsman of the 1970s and ’80s, the best West Indies batsman ever and the 2nd best right-handed test batsman ever at one down position after Don Bradman. 

Ponting had a better aggregate and average than Viv but was not as successful as Viv overseas or destroyed bowling as mercilessly. 

In more recent times Virender Sehwag, Chris Gayle or Adam Gilchrist may have been as brutal or even more than Viv, but none in my view could equal Viv’s performances against top-class pace bowling.

Viv is probably the best-ever ODI batsman if you assess his impact and strike rate during his time, match-winning efforts and performances in ODI finals. 

In ODI’s won by West Indies, he averaged almost 57 and all his 11 centuries took his team to victories. No batsmen averaged more than Viv in world cup cricket. 

Combining Test and ODI Cricket Viv is a strong candidate for the best batsman ever, considering his great match-winning prowess. 

Viv could turn the course of games with a greater degree of conviction than both Lara and Tendulkar, or even Virat Kohli today. Batting wickets and bowling attacks were more challenging in Viv’s era.

Amongst the greatest cricketers ever there is a strong case for Viv Richards being ranked just below Bradman and Sobers. 

Viv has been ranked in 9th place amongst the 100 best cricketers ever by Cristopher Martin Jenkins, in Eighth place by John Woodcock and fifth place by David Gower.

It must be mentioned that Viv is rated even higher than the likes of Lara, Tendulkar or Ponting by not only players of his era like Ian Botham, Allan Border, the Chappell brothers, and Barry Richards etc, by players of later eras like Wasim Akram, Inzamam Ul Haq, Shane Warne, Saed Anwar etc.

It is notable the awe with which Imran Khan, Ian Botham and Dennis Lillee rate Viv the best batsman they ever saw.

Even if not as technically sound or artistic as some, Viv was greater torn in the flesh than anyone. 

Michael Holding felt that Viv had the potential of breaking any batting record if he wished, but he never pursued them. 

Significant that in Richard Sydenham’s list of all-time XIs Viv has garnered more votes than any batsman, with 64 players choosing him, 11 more than even Bradman. 

Mike Selvey and Mark Nicholas rate Viv a more impactful cricketer than even Sobers, but I strongly disagree with this statement.

Above all we must treat him as a human being and not an apostle, who stood up for the glory of the Afro-American race, by opting out of the tour of South Africa 1981-82, being an outspoken critic of racism, upholding the spirit of sport and escalating joy to the game. 

I can never forget my personal very short meeting with me at JW Marriot hotel three years ago when he smiled from his very soul, just like when he batted.